A big discussion in the UN headquarters about nuclear program of Tehran – what is about? Is it a real fear about real plans of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to create a weapon of mass destruction? Or pretext for next "small victorious war" for Bush's administration just before the elections in the USA? Or the next, absolutely useless, attempt of stopping the nuclear proliferation?
     Founded in 1957 International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in modern history more & more has looked like a sleeping princess. The princess that couldn't notice anything. Who found out that South Africa had produced 6 absolutely workable nuclear weapons only when they decided to disassemble them in the beginning of 1990th.
     Let's try to make clear some questions. Can Iran create a real atom bomb in the nearest future? Or it's only a "peaceful atom" and nothing more? What is the true target of Iran in these "dances around centrifuges" and nuclear power plant in Busher?
     May be, you don't know, but United States was the "godfather" of Iran's nuclear program. They sold to Iran a reactor & enriched uranium too. Yes, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi was "son of a bitch, but he was American's son of a bitch".
     Formally Iran will have no problems with delivery systems of nuclear weapons. Their own ballistic missiles such as Shahab-3, aircrafts from former Soviet Su-24 to American F-4. But, to my mind, these "stop-and-go games" are only the cover, the camouflage to Iran's plans. Millions of people in burning Iraq are waiting for calm life without overseas invaders. And what do the Shia from the full of oil south of Iraq see?
     They see usual everyday life without high risk of being killed when you are go shopping, mosques without explosions around or in them. And the main thing – there are no aggressive infidels. Democracy? Don't make me laugh! People here, in the Middle East, don't know what it means. How many institutes of democracy can you find in Saudi Arabia or Kuwait?
     Under the camouflage of these "attempts to be a nuclear" Iran's leaders, s I think, are going with minimal resistance to their real target – step-by-step inclusion of the Southern Iraq into their sphere of influence, with real integration into one country, may be a few years later.
     Now we see interesting problems with Bush's point of view. I can understand their "problems of vision" with more than 100 Israel's nuclear warheads and kidnapping work of Israel intelligence services (do you remember Mordechai Vanunu?). This country has responsible and compos mentis leaders. The control over H-bombs here is strong and serious.
     But why have they forgotten about Pakistan? The country which is not a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The country that has a permanent "warm" conflict with other owner of "nuclear devices". The country that is "home, sweet some" for Taliban, al-Qaeda and other "peace & philanthropic" organizations. The country with regular military coup d'etates.
     But Washington continue to support Islamabad in all spheres including the support of Military of Pakistan, the only organization in the world that together with possession of nuclear weapons has the close long time friendship terrorist unions. The organization that is crazy enough to help anybody to begin nuclear inferno tomorrow.

© Dr D & Dilby.com